Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1/11/1989
Wassif v. Wassif
Citations
- 551 A.2d 935
- 77 Md. App. 750
- 1989 Md. App. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony to spouse who owned $500,-000 interest in marital home and numerous condominium properties
- noting that in family law matters, the Court “has limited review under the Supremacy Clause to a determination whether Congress has ‘positively required by direct enactment’ that the state law be preempted.”
- relying on H.R.Rep. No. 432, Part II, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in the 1984 U.S.Code Cong. & Admim.News 697, 1140
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nichols v. TedderMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 194×
- Dietz v. DietzCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-10-19· cited 75×
- Miller v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-31· cited 55×
- Gentile v. GentileDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-01· cited 54×
- Broseus v. BroseusCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-03-06· cited 52×
- Serrano v. SerranoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-11-21· cited 41×
- Reuter v. ReuterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-11· cited 41×
- Doser v. DoserCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-07· cited 36×
- Rock v. RockCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-04-01· cited 35×
- Lemley v. LemleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-31· cited 35×
- Monterey County v. CornejoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-07-18· cited 32×
- In Re the Marriage of PeacockCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-04-27· cited 26×
- Gwodz v. GwodzNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-06-20· cited 23×
- Motes v. MotesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-11-16· cited 22×
- Kline v. KlineCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-11-15· cited 21×
- Imagnu v. WodajoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-04· cited 21×
- Harbom v. HarbomCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-10-03· cited 20×
- Dunlap v. FiorenzaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-09-30· cited 20×
- Babka v. BabkaNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-03-09· cited 19×
- Blake v. BlakeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-09· cited 19×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cross v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 106×
- Holston v. HolstonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-06· cited 68×
- Fudenberg v. MolstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-07-08· cited 51×
- Lincoln v. LincolnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-08-11· cited 46×
- Prahinski v. PrahinskiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-09-02· cited 40×
- Davis v. FairTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1986-03-27· cited 40×
- Crawford v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-04-07· cited 39×
- Lorenz v. LorenzMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-02-01· cited 38×
- Marriage of Pergolski v. PergolskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-01-19· cited 35×
- Benkin v. BenkinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-05-06· cited 26×
- Marriage of Theroux v. BoehmlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-08-11· cited 24×
- Marriage of Gerardy v. GerardyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-05-19· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.