Wassif v. Wassif

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court did not abuse its discretion in awarding alimony to spouse who owned $500,-000 interest in marital home and numerous condominium properties
• noting that in family law matters, the Court “has limited review under the Supremacy Clause to a determination whether Congress has ‘positively required by direct enactment’ that the state law be preempted.”
• relying on H.R.Rep. No. 432, Part II, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in the 1984 U.S.Code Cong. & Admim.News 697, 1140

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).