Skip to main content

Citations

  • 382 So. 2d 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing permanent alimony award that left former husband with $200 per month
  • trial court is without jurisdiction to enter post-appeal orders which modify final judgment appealed from
  • award that left the husband with fifty dollars per week to live on was error
  • court found a clear abuse of discretion when husband left with $50 per week after support obligations were paid
  • no contractual basis to require former husband to provide a college education for his children where his statement indicated that he hoped to be able to send them to college
  • award requiring husband to pay over $4000 per month excessive where compliance would leave him with about $200 per month to live on without discharging any of his other responsibilities and duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkdull, Hendry and Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.