Calderon v. Calderon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding, in part, because final judgment failed to state findings of value for three assets, regardless of how proper distribution appeared
• former husband could not be charged with permanent periodic alimony, child support, and mortgage payments totaling $2549, where his net income was $2760
• former husband could not be charged with permanent periodic alimony, child support, and mortgage payments totaling $2549, where his net income was $2760
• former husband could not be charged with permanent periodic alimony, child support, and mortgage payments totaling $2549, where his net income, according to child support guidelines worksheet adopted by court, was $2760

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).