Skip to main content

Bonham v. State

Citations

  • 644 S.W.2d 5
  • 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding trial court’s failure to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the disputed fact issues surrounding the taking of a confession was remediable under Rule 44.4
  • appeal abated and trial court directed to make written findings as to admissibility of confession
  • trial court did not reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on disputed fact issues surrounding taking of confession
  • trial court did not reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on disputed fact issues surrounding taking of confession
  • “One purpose for requiring the trial court to enter his order as to findings of facts and conclusions of law is to make the record reflect for the parties and for possible appellate review the basis of the ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.