Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 4/12/2011
Wilson v. State
Citations
- 348 S.W.3d 32
- 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2684
- 2011 WL 1364972
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the promise to ‘call the district attorney and say . . . what really happened’ does not create an involuntary confession”
- holding that “the promise to ‘call the district attorney and say . . . what really happened’ does not create an involuntary confession”
- holding that a jury does not invade the province of the Board when it determines the probability of a capital defendant’s future dangerousness
- holding that 11 “the promise to ‘call the district attorney and say . . . what really happened’ does not create an involuntary confession”
- holding that 11 “the promise to ‘call the district attorney and say . . . what really happened’ does not create an involuntary confession”
- conducting separation-of-powers analysis and concluding prosecutors fall within judicial branch
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John S. Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilkerson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-10-12· cited 47×
- Herbert Ray Wilson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2015-04-16
- Herbert Ray Wilson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-12-13
- Bradley Jared Barton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-11-22
- Terry Don Wilkerson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-05-03
- Gerardo Tomas Rivas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-03-14
- Michael O'Neal Hutchins A/K/A Michael ONeal Hutchins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-11-21
- Wilson, Herbert RayCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-18
- Bert Griffin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2021-01-14
- Wilson v. TexasSupreme Court· 2012-10-01
- Mark Steven Virovatz v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2026-02-12
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 4,521×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-26· cited 3,205×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,617×
- Heitman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-26· cited 1,035×
- Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-06· cited 583×
- Meshell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 390×
- Creager v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-10· cited 350×
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-11-17· cited 217×
- Meadoux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-11-17· cited 171×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-18· cited 127×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-29· cited 118×
- State v. MooreTexas Supreme Court· 1882-06-13· cited 96×
- Cienfuegos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-08-26· cited 78×
- Herrera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-05-16· cited 50×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.