Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 348 S.W.3d 32
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2684
  • 2011 WL 1364972

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the promise to ‘call the district attorney and say . . . what really happened’ does not create an involuntary confession”
  • holding that “the promise to ‘call the district attorney and say . . . what really happened’ does not create an involuntary confession”
  • holding that a jury does not invade the province of the Board when it determines the probability of a capital defendant’s future dangerousness
  • holding that 11 “the promise to ‘call the district attorney and say . . . what really happened’ does not create an involuntary confession”
  • holding that 11 “the promise to ‘call the district attorney and say . . . what really happened’ does not create an involuntary confession”
  • conducting separation-of-powers analysis and concluding prosecutors fall within judicial branch

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John S. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.