Ujjaval B. Dave v. John D. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “in immigration proceedings, a petitioner has no liberty or property interest in obtaining purely discre- tionary relief . . . and the denial of such relief therefore cannot implicate due process”
• “[I]n immigration proceedings, a petitioner has no liberty or property interest in ■obtaining purely discretionary relief[.]”
• deny- ing alien’s petition for review of removal order where alien was convicted of reckless discharge of a firearm
• con- cluding that, even if the petitioner had asserted properly a denial of due process under the Fifth Amendment, § 1252(a)(2) (B)(i
• “[T]he decision when to commence deportation proceedings is within the discretion of the Attorney General and does not, therefore, involve a protected property or liberty interest.”
• “[W]e may not decide a case without subject matter jurisdiction and thus neither the parties nor their lawyers may . . . waive arguments that the court lacks jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).