Skip to main content

Fox v. State

Citations

  • 283 S.W.3d 85
  • 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 2433
  • 2009 WL 838234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing error of reading back some but not all responsive testimony for non-constitutional harm under Rule 44.2(b)
  • “Because the statements elicited by defense counsel on cross-examination varied from the statements made on direct examination and the conflicting statements were highly probative of appellant’s guilt, the trial court’s error is harmful.”
  • “Because the statements elicited by defense counsel on cross-examination varied from the statements made on direct examination and the conflicting statements were highly probative of appellant’s guilt, the trial court’s error is harmful.”
  • “The act of cross-dressing constitutes ‘other acts’ under rule 404(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adele Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.