Skip to main content

Bishop v. State

Citations

  • 869 S.W.2d 342
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 185
  • 1993 WL 481861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining evidence of defendant’s sexual proclivities and practices qualified as “other acts” under Rule 404(b)
  • relying on ―federal case law dealing with an identical provision in the Federal Rules of Evidence,‖ and noting that the court‘s research ―turned up no Texas cases in which Rule 406 was significantly discussed‖
  • acts testified to by ex-wife were not so unusual and distinctive and so nearly identical to the charged offense as to amount to a signature of the defendant
  • using the terms identity, signature, and handiwork synonymously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Clinton, McCormick, White, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.