Fox v. Loews Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nevertheless, the Court addresses the Amended Complaint’s five claims and the parties’ arguments in order to give Plaintiff direction on how to proceed with a final, amended pleading . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Point Conversion, LLC v. Tropical Paradise Resorts, LLC
  S.D. Florida· 2018-06-13· cited 4×

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
  Supreme Court· 2016-05-16· cited 7,043×
• Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-03-11· cited 728×
• Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-06-30· cited 482×
• Stalley Ex Rel. United States v. Orlando Regional Healthcare System, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-04-18· cited 465×
• Davis v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-02-06· cited 453×
• Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Company
  Eleventh Circuit· 2009-08-11· cited 452×
• McElmurray v. CONSOLIDATED GOV'T, AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY
  Eleventh Circuit· 2007-10-01· cited 421×
• Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority
  Supreme Court· 2012-04-18· cited 390×
• Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-01-29· cited 385×
• Strategic Income Fund, L.L.C., Hennessy Cadillac, Inc. v. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg Corporation, First Options of Chicago, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2002-09-23· cited 314×
• Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Joseph Mosseri
  Eleventh Circuit· 2013-12-02· cited 308×
• Peners L. Griffin and Henry L. Dejerinett v. Richard L. Dugger, Etc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-09-23· cited 204×
• Aldana v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2005-07-08· cited 200×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,589 Securities & Exchange Commission v. Esm Group, Inc., Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co., Claimant-Appellant
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-02-10· cited 172×
• Celotex Corp. v. Hillsborough Holdings Corp. (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)
  M.D. Florida· 1994-10-13· cited 40×
• Eisenberg v. City of Miami Beach
  S.D. Florida· 2014-03-03· cited 19×
• Hard Candy, LLC v. Hard Candy Fitness, LLC
  S.D. Florida· 2015-05-13· cited 16×
• SIG, Inc. v. AT & T Digital Life, Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 2013-09-12· cited 16×