Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “Rule 41 allows a plaintiff to dismiss all of his claims against a particular de- fendant”
• holding that to demonstrate their entitlement to injunctive relief the plaintiffs must sufficiently allege, among other things, “a substantial likelihood of success on the merits” and that “irreparable injury will be suffered unless the injunction issues”
• acknowledging that Rule 41(a) “al- lows a plaintiff to dismiss all of his claims against a particular de- fendant”
• explaining that “the proper remedies for statutory violations . . . and the standards for granting statutorily-authorized injunctions are necessarily controlled by the statute itself”
• noting that an injunction entered to preserve the status quo pending a final resolution is “perhaps the textbook definition of a preliminary injunction”
• noting that an ineffective dismissal of claims under Rule 41(a) could be construed as a motion to amend the pleadings under Rule 15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).