Skip to main content
· 2/10/1988

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,589 Securities & Exchange Commission v. Esm Group, Inc., Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co., Claimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 835 F.2d 270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the first element of an independent action is “a judgment which ought not, in equity and good conscience, to be enforced”
  • finding allegations that amount to a failure to disclose information that would have helped an opposing party’s defense insufficient for fraud 19 on the court because it “[a]t best” went to witness credibility, not to any miscarriage of justice
  • “Fraud that prevents the functioning of the judicial process does not have to be brought within any specific period of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Anderson, Atkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.