Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a remand is unnecessary when the record “demonstrates beyond any question that Rule 11 sanctions are in order”
• holding that the district court abused its discretion in declining to impose sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, and concluding that remand was unnecessary because the record “demonstrates beyond any question that Rule 11 sanctions are in order”
• stating that the plaintiff has 28 RICO standing if he shows “a causal connection between his injury and a predicate act”
• stating that each plaintiff must demonstrate reliance on deceptive conduct in furtherance of the alleged RICO scheme
• discussing elements of mail and wire fraud; requiring individualized proof of reliance on deceptive conduct and injury
• finding no standing as to predicate act of bankruptcy fraud where predicate act actually benefitted plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).