Skip to main content

Root v. Root

Citations

  • 851 P.2d 67
  • 1993 Alas. LEXIS 35
  • 1993 WL 134363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if significant marital asset has been identified but no evidence has been presented as to its value, \the best practice is for the trial court to direct the parties ... to fill the evidentiary void\
  • court should direct parties to supply evidence concerning value of significant assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Witz, Burke, Matthews, Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.