Skip to main content

Faris v. Taylor

Citations

  • 444 P.3d 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pointing to record evidence that “a financial entanglement continued,” including jointly owned properties and joint tax returns, as justifying superior court’s selection of date of separation
  • “Parties who control a marital asset during separation may be required to compensate the other party if they dissipate or waste the asset or convert it to non-marital form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bolger, Carney, Maassen, Stowers, Winfree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.