· 10/13/2000
Jenkins v. Handel
Citations
- 10 P.3d 586
- 2000 Alas. LEXIS 96
- 2000 WL 1516965
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \[the trial court has broad discretion in the determination of child custody issues\ and that \[wle will reverse a trial court's resolution of custody issues only if ... we are convinced that the trial court abused its discretion ...\
- discussing effect of mother's work schedule on her availability to care for her children in custody modification case
- affirming finding that mother's substantial improvement in some important areas was insufficient to justify modification when court based its decision on lack of improvement in other areas
- declining to prioritize 13- and 15-year-old children’s preferences in custody dispute because they were unduly influenced by other adults and older sibling
- affirming superior court’s decision not to award custody of teenagers to parent with whom they expressed desire to live
- finding the preference of 13- and 15-year-old children to be unreliable due to the influence of a sexual relationship with an older man and by siblings and adults within the community
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.