Skip to main content
· 10/13/2000

Jenkins v. Handel

Citations

  • 10 P.3d 586
  • 2000 Alas. LEXIS 96
  • 2000 WL 1516965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \[the trial court has broad discretion in the determination of child custody issues\ and that \[wle will reverse a trial court's resolution of custody issues only if ... we are convinced that the trial court abused its discretion ...\
  • discussing effect of mother's work schedule on her availability to care for her children in custody modification case
  • affirming finding that mother's substantial improvement in some important areas was insufficient to justify modification when court based its decision on lack of improvement in other areas
  • declining to prioritize 13- and 15-year-old children’s preferences in custody dispute because they were unduly influenced by other adults and older sibling
  • affirming superior court’s decision not to award custody of teenagers to parent with whom they expressed desire to live
  • finding the preference of 13- and 15-year-old children to be unreliable due to the influence of a sexual relationship with an older man and by siblings and adults within the community

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.