Fields v. State
Citations
- 46 Fla. 84
Syllabus
<p>1. Where a writ of error is sued out jointly by two defendants, but only one of said defendants assigns errors in this court, the proceedings. in error, so far as the defendant who fails to assign errors is concerned, will be treated as abandoned.</p> <p>2. It is within the sound judicial discretion of the trial court to control the detailed examination of witnesses, and, unless an abuse of this judicial discretion is shown to the appellate court, it will not disturb or reverse the ruling.</p> <p>3. A defendant in a criminal case'can not cross-examine a State witness about matters as to which he has not testified in his direct examination.</p> <p>4. A witness can not be cross-examined as to any fact which is collateral or irrelevant to the issue merely for the purpose of contradicting him by other evidence if he should deny it, thereby to discredit his testimony.</p> <p>5. For the purpose of discrediting a witness a wide range of cross-examination is permitted as a matter of right in regard to his motives, interest or animus as connected with the cause or the parties thereto, upon which matters he may'be contradicted by other evidence.</p> <p>6. Evidence 'of declarations or acts of a defendant, prior to the commission of a .crime by him, in his own favor or interest, falling within the class designated as “self-serving declarations and acts” and forming no part of the res gestae, is not admissible.</p> <p>7. Threats are admissible when they are part of the res gestae or when there is any doubt as to who began the difficulty, and it is not material in either of these cases that they should have been previously conveyed to the defendant.</p> <p>8. The physical or mental condition or appearance of a person, or his manner, habit or conduct, may be proved by the opinion of an ordinary witness, founded on observation.</p> <p>9. Where part of a conversation is given in evidence the defendant is entitled to have before the jury all that was said upon the subject upon the
Judges: Carter, Cockrell, Hocicer, Maxwell, Shackleford, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 120×
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 82×
- Walter Wynn, Jr. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-11-16· cited 68×
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 58×
- Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 44×
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 39×
- Williams v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida· 1915-02-23· cited 38×
- Gelabert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-23· cited 32×
- Markey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 32×
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-02-24· cited 29×
- Urga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-05-10· cited 26×
- State v. ArdoinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-04-14· cited 25×
- Presley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-01-15· cited 23×
- Tully v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-06-03· cited 22×
- Platt v. RowandSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 20×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 18×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 15×
- Leaptrot v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 13×
- West v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 11×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 11×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1903-01-19· cited 99×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 81×
- Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-01-15· cited 79×
- Eldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-01-15· cited 35×
- Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 33×
- Higginbotham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 32×
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 25×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 21×
- Birdsong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1872-01-15· cited 21×
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-06-15· cited 16×
- People v. WassonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-08-27· cited 10×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri· 1877-10-15· cited 9×
- Whorley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 8×
- State v. UmfriedSupreme Court of Missouri· 1882-10-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.