Jenkins v. State
Citations
- 58 Fla. 62
Syllabus
<p>1. Questions on the cross-examination must be confined, to the matters elicited on the direct, unless to test memory, credibility etc.</p> <p>2. Error in excluding a question is without injury where the question is afterwards answered without objections.</p> <p>3. Where it is sought to show drunkenness of the defendant in excuse for crime, questions not limited to the condition of the defendant, but tending to raise the immaterial issue of the use of intoxicating liquor by “the boys” are properly excluded.</p> <p>4. Paying for stolen property will not purge the original taking of its felony or constitute a defense to a prosecution therefor, and hence evidence of that fact is properly excluded.</p> <p>5. The defendant cannot show self-serving acts before or subsequent to the crime, for this would permit him to make evidence for himself.</p> <p>6. After a witness has been examined in chief and is recalled in rebuttal, the court may properly prevent a simple repetition of his testimony. A party after his examinaticn of a witness and after closing his testimony has no absolute right to recall this witness to establish matters not in rebuttal. Whether this rule ought to be varied is a question for the trial court, and an appellate court, if it interferes at all, will only do so where it sees that injustice has been done through this action.</p> <p>7. To constitute the crime of breaking and entering a store house with intent to commit petit larceny, the defendant must have had an intent to commit the misdemeanor in the house, otherwise the breaking and entering would amount to a trespass.</p> <p>8. Upon the trial of a defendant for breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor, his intoxication, though voluntary, becomes a matter for consideration by the jury with reference to the ability of the accused to form or entertain such intent. If therefore, the defendant was too intoxicated' to entertain or form this essential particular intent, such intent could
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Linehan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 89×
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 47×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-11-29· cited 46×
- Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 44×
- Penn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-15· cited 38×
- Reid v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-07-22· cited 23×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 15×
- Lowery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-08-12· cited 14×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-06-06· cited 12×
- Barton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-11-21· cited 11×
- McNair v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-01-15· cited 10×
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-16· cited 9×
- Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-12· cited 9×
- Stiles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-20· cited 6×
- Dowis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-02-06· cited 4×
- Davis v. Government of Canal ZoneFifth Circuit· 1924-05-01· cited 4×
- Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-12-08· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 49×
- Coker v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida· 1878-01-15· cited 40×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 34×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 27×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-01-15· cited 14×
- Truslow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1895-06-21· cited 13×
- People v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-01-27· cited 10×
- Ashford v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1893-01-03· cited 7×
- Feister v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1888-06-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.