Sims v. State
Citations
- 59 Fla. 38
Syllabus
<p>1. Where evidence is admitted without objection, it is regarded as having'been received by consent.</p> <p>2. The grounds of objection to testimony should be specifically stated in the objection, and general grounds that the proffered testimony is irrelevant or immaterial will not avail if the evidence is admissible for any purpose.</p> <p>3. If evidence is admitted without objection or if a question propounded to a witness is not objected to on proper grounds before it is answered, it is then too late to merely object on any ground to the evidence or to the answer to the question. In such cases a'motion may be made to strike the evidence if the motion is based upon some ground of irrelevancy, immateriality or legal inadmissibility.</p> <p>4. The physical or mental condition or appearance of a person, or his manner, habit or conduct may be proved by the opinion of an ordinary witness, founded on observation, therefore in a criminal prosecution it is not error to permit a witness to testify that upon observation the defendant “appeared like he was a pretty mad man.”</p> <p>5. A motion to strike all the testimony of a witness is properly denied when some of the testimony was admissible.</p> <p>6. A motion to strike out testimony that had been admitted must be predicated upon some feature of irrelevancy, incompetency, legal inadmissibility or imp'ertinency in the evidence itself, and not upon the ground that it is not sufficient.</p> <p>7. The admissibility of testimony does not depend upon its sufficiency to prove the issue.</p> <p>8. In a prosecution for homicide testimony that after the defendant ran off from the scene of the homicide he called to a companion who was present to “come on,” is not wholly Irrelevant.</p> <p>9. In a prosecution for murder, a confession freely and voluntarily made by the defendant is admissible as in other criminal cases.</p> <p>10. Where a homicide is shown, testimony as to a voluntary confession made by the accused is admissible to
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony that defendant at time of crime \appeared like he was a pretty mad man\ held admissible
- \The admissibility of testimony does not depend upon its sufficiency to prove the issue\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Palmes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-05· cited 117×
- Reddish v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1964-10-07· cited 67×
- The People v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court· 1925-12-16· cited 66×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-02-17· cited 55×
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-11-09· cited 33×
- Cochran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-02-04· cited 26×
- Synes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-07-29· cited 20×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1925-10-08· cited 20×
- McCullers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-07-03· cited 15×
- Porter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-07· cited 11×
- Fincke v. PeeplesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-09-18· cited 10×
- The People v. BishopIllinois Supreme Court· 1934-12-19· cited 10×
- Studstill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-05-19· cited 9×
- Winnemore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-01-23· cited 8×
- Shiver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-10· cited 7×
- Whitten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-07-07· cited 5×
- Whitten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-08-12· cited 4×
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-07-06· cited 2×
- Beard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-01-08
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 65×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 34×
- Higginbotham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 32×
- Dickens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 32×
- Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 31×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-01-15· cited 31×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 30×
- Maloy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 27×
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 25×
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 22×
- Platt v. RowandSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.