Lester v. State
Citations
- 37 Fla. 382
Syllabus
<p>CRIMINAL LAW—DYING DECLARATIONS—IMPEACHMENT OP—ADMISSIBILITY OP THREATS—PREJUDICIAL REMARKS BY JUDGE—CHAPTER 4400 LAWS IS CONSTITUTIONAL—EXCEPTING TO REFUSALS TO GIVE REQUESTED INSTRUCTIONS.</p> <p>1. Dying declarations in cases of homicide form an exception to the rule against the admissibility of heresay evidence. To render such declarations admissible the judge must be fully satisfied that the deceased declarent, at the time of their utterance, knew that his death was imminent and inevitable, and that he entertained no hope whatever of recovery. This absence of all hope of recovery, and appreciation by the declarent of his.speedy and inevitable death is a preliminary foundation that must always be laid to make such declarations admissible. It is a mixed question of law-and fact for the judge to decide, before permitting the introduction of the declaration itself. The judge hears all pertinent evidence that exhibits the state of mind of the deceased at the time of making the declaration, settles any conflicts in such testimony and, if fully satisfied that it was made under such circumstances as render it legally admissible, it should be ad- ■ mitted. It is not necessary that such preliminary test should consist of express utterances, but it may be gathered from any circumstance or from all the circumstances of the case.</p> <p>2. While the dying declarations of the deceased are admissible in evidence in homicide cases, when shown to have been made under proper circumstances, and, when admitted, are entitled to their appropriate weight as evidence, yet they are open to observation and impeachment in any of the modes by which the evidence of the deceased could have been impeached had he been alive and testifying under oath. It may be impeached by showing that the general reputation of the deceased for truth and veracity in the community in which he lived was bad, and that he could not be believed under oath.</p> <p>3. Great care should always be observed by the t
Judges: Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Torres-Arboledo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-24· cited 137×
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 83×
- Leon Davis, Jr. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-11-10· cited 82×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 81×
- Teffeteller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-08-25· cited 75×
- Hayward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-12-10· cited 70×
- Raulerson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-04-23· cited 47×
- ST. v. Falls Chase Spec. Taxing Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-21· cited 46×
- State ex rel. Bonsteel v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-02-10· cited 44×
- Price v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-31· cited 41×
- Lowman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-06-10· cited 40×
- The People v. KellyIllinois Supreme Court· 1931-12-17· cited 36×
- Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-12-24· cited 35×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 34×
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-07-27· cited 32×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-01-15· cited 30×
- Kellum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-06-24· cited 29×
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 27×
- Richard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 26×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1869-07-01· cited 51×
- State v. AlgoodTennessee Supreme Court· 1888-12-31· cited 40×
- Roten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 14×
- State v. TongNevada Supreme Court· 1871-10-15· cited 14×
- Schoolcraft v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1886-06-12· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.