Herndon v. State
Citations
- 73 Fla. 451
- 74 So. 511
Syllabus
<p>1. In passing upon an assignment questioning the correctness of the ruling of the trial court in denying a motion for new trial which is based upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, the guiding principle for an appellate court is not what it may think the jury ought to have done or what such court may think it would have done had it been sitting as a jury in the case, but whether as reasonable men the jury could have found such verdict. If this question can be answered in the affirmative, the action of the trial court upon such motion should not be disturbed.</p> <p>2. While the legal effect of evidence is a question of law to be passed upon by the court when properly presented, the credibility and probative force of conflicting testimony are for the determination of the jury.</p> <p>3. The answer of a witness on cross-examination respecting any fact irrelevant to the issue will be conclusive, and no questions relating to facts irrelevant to the issue can be put on cross-examination merely for the purpose of impeaching the credit of the witness by contradicting him.</p> <p>4. In a prosecution for murder, objections'interposed to questions propounded on the direct examination of a witness are properly sustained, when such questions seek-to elicit information from the witness as to the distance between the defendant and the deceased when the fatal encounter took place and as to how far from the deceased a certain designated track was, and it has been made to appear from the examination of such witness that he was not present at the tragedy, but had visited the place thereof after it had occurred and saw tracks there, and that all the information which the witness possessed as- to the distance between the defendant and the deceased at the time of the shooting and as to the identity of the tracks which the witness saw was derived from statements made to the witness by the defendant and others. Browne, C. J. and Taylor, J., dissent.</p> <p>5. App
Judges: Browne, Shackleford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-07-28· cited 37×
- Gelabert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-23· cited 32×
- Tyson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-04-12· cited 26×
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-08-05· cited 17×
- Kirkland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-07-13· cited 15×
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-07-09· cited 13×
- Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-03-13· cited 13×
- Hamlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-07-10· cited 11×
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-12-05· cited 10×
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-02-04· cited 9×
- Farley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-07-26· cited 9×
- Weeks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-10-19· cited 8×
- Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-08-02· cited 8×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-02-26· cited 7×
- Gadsden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-05-12· cited 7×
- Cason v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-09-17· cited 4×
- Davis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Florida· 1942-03-10· cited 3×
- McNeal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-08-08· cited 3×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 44×
- Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 39×
- Eldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-01-15· cited 35×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 34×
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-06-15· cited 27×
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 27×
- Starke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-01-15· cited 27×
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 25×
- Presley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-01-15· cited 23×
- Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-02-03· cited 22×
- Tully v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-06-03· cited 22×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 21×
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-11-25· cited 21×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-07-08· cited 19×
- Barrentine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-06-13· cited 19×
- Long v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 18×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-01-28· cited 17×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 16×
- Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-06-15· cited 14×
- Kirkland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-12-21· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.