Eldridge v. State
Citations
- 27 Fla. 162
Syllabus
<p>1. A plea in abatement setting up the pendency of another indictment in the same court against the defendant for the same offense charged in the indictment upon which he is put upon trial, is bad, and constitutes no ground for abating the prosecution.</p> <p>2. In a prosecution of an editor of a newspaper for libel, and a publication in the same paper subsequent to the finding of the indictment is offered in evidence on the question of malice, some connection must be shown between the publication complained of and the publication offered in evidence, and if the subsequent publication tends to show ill will towards the person concerning whom the publication complained of is made, and is of such a nature as to indicate a persistent disposition of hatred or ill will towards him, or if it indicates a part of a set- . tied purpose to bring him into public hatred, contempt or ridicule, and is sufficiently near in time to afford a natural inference that the same state of mind existed when the publication complained of was made, it is admissible.</p> <p>3. A witness cannot be cross-examined as to any fact which is collateral or irrelevant to the issue merely for the purpose of contradicting him by other evidence if he should deny it, thereby to discredit his testimony.</p> <p>4. The motives, interest or animus of a witness are not collateral matters, and these may be shown and considered by the jury in estimating the credibility of a witness, and as to such matters he may be contradicted.</p> <p>5. It is competent to show as a fact feelings of hostility on the part of a witness, or the state of a witness’ mind, in respect to the person against whom he testifies, and the jury may consider this hostility or bias in estimating his testimony; but an inquiry into the conduct and acts of parties producing hostility not relating to the matters in issue should not be permitted.</p> <p>C. The use of opium cannot be intx’oduced to impair the credit of a witness unless it be shown
Judges: Mabry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 83×
- Abraham v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 83×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-10-28· cited 61×
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals· 1959-05-14· cited 60×
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 58×
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-09-07· cited 51×
- Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 39×
- Williams v. DickensonSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-06-15· cited 36×
- Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 36×
- Sheffield v. SheffieldMississippi Supreme Court· 1981-11-18· cited 35×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 34×
- Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 33×
- Gelabert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-23· cited 32×
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-02-24· cited 29×
- Hartley & Parker v. CopelandSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-04-06· cited 26×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 21×
- State v. AdjmiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-12-29· cited 20×
- Lusher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-06-18· cited 19×
- Kelly v. Maryland Casualty Co.W.D. Virginia· 1929-07-16· cited 18×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Atwood v. WeltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1828-06-15· cited 39×
- People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court· 1879-07-01· cited 32×
- Selph v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1886-06-15· cited 31×
- Kennedy v. GiffordNew York Supreme Court· 1838-05-15· cited 23×
- Dutton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1854-12-11· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. DamonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1884-02-29· cited 17×
- Williams v. MinerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1847-07-15· cited 17×
- Livingston v. Roberts'Supreme Court of Florida· 1881-01-15· cited 7×
- State v. RiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1872-11-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.