Pittman v. State
Citations
- 51 Fla. 94
Syllabus
<p>1. Chapter 5132 of the Laws of 1903, prescribing the requisites to be complied with by parties charged with crime in applications for the procurement of witnesses for their defense at the cost of the county, is not in conflict with or violative of either Section 11 or. Section 14 of the declarar tion of rights of the State Constitution of 1885. And, when the cost of the procurement of such witnesses is initiatorily proposed to be thrown upon the county, a sound judicial discretion is vested in the trial judge to determine whether or not the statutory requirements have been properly compiled with, and also to determine the bona tides of such application, and an appellate court will not disturb the action of the trial judge upon such application, unless an abuse of this judicial discretion is clearly made to appear.</p> <p>2. Application under Chapter 5132 of the Laws of 1903, for the procurement of witnesses, at the cost of the county, for the defense of parties charged with crime, should be seasonably made at the earliest reasonable opportunity, and not withheld until the case is actually called for trial.</p> <p>3, The sixth amendment to the Federal Constitution has reference only to powers exercised by the government of the United States, and not to those of the States.</p> <p>4. In criminal as well as in civil cases an application for a continuance is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court, and the denial of such a motion will not be reversed by an appellate court, unless there has been a palpable abuse of this judicial discretion, which must he clearly and affirmatively made to appear in the bill of exceptions, the rule being that motions for a continuance in criminal cases are to be even more closely scanned than in civil cases, because of the greater temptation to delay.</p> <p>5. Where there are assignments of error in a criminal case which are not argued, but merely repeated and insisted upon in the brief of plaintiff in error, an a
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Tavlor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 120×
- State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court· 1950-08-10· cited 113×
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 65×
- Clinton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 60×
- Rumely v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1923-07-27· cited 56×
- Magill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-09-08· cited 52×
- Putnal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 44×
- Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 44×
- Griswold v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-04-23· cited 41×
- Witters v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1939-06-27· cited 32×
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 30×
- Cross v. AbySupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 30×
- Sinclair v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1950-04-04· cited 26×
- State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-06-15· cited 26×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-10-26· cited 24×
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 22×
- Casebeer v. HudspethTenth Circuit· 1941-08-02· cited 21×
- State v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court· 1916-08-29· cited 21×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-08-06· cited 20×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-12-21· cited 20×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court· 1852-02-18· cited 200×
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 83×
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 82×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-01-15· cited 62×
- Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1890-07-28· cited 55×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 42×
- State v. BerkleySupreme Court of Missouri· 1887-04-15· cited 38×
- Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 36×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1880-01-15· cited 35×
- Eldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-01-15· cited 35×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-01-15· cited 34×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 34×
- Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 33×
- Markey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 32×
- Dickens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 32×
- Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 31×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 27×
- Goode v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 25×
- Langford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.