Ex Parte Ghahremani

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of false evidence must have been material to justify granting relief
• holding that applicant is also required to show that a due process violation was not harmless in the context of possible false testimony
• observing that it is a violation of due process for the State to fail to correct testimony that it knows to be false or that leaves a false impression with the trier of fact
• agreeing with convicting court’s determination that evidence was false because it “creat[ed] a misleading impression of the facts”
• determining that police reports indicating that minor sexual assault victim had been assaulted by others and had abused drugs demonstrated falsity of parents’ testimony that victim’s need for intensive mental health treatment was caused solely by defendant’s abuse of victim
• \It is sufficient if the witness's testimony gives the trier of fact a false impression.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).