Skip to main content

Eaves v. State

Citations

  • 141 S.W.3d 686
  • 2004 WL 1170403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although Eaves claims on appeal that his proffered testimony was admissible pursuant to one of the exceptions provided for in [Rule 412], . . . he never raised that argument before the trial court and therefore failed to preserve it for our review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.