Eaves v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although Eaves claims on appeal that his proffered testimony was admissible pursuant to one of the exceptions provided for in [Rule 412], . . . he never raised that argument before the trial court and therefore failed to preserve it for our review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).