Supreme Court· 1/9/2007

Burton v. Stewart

Citations

549 U.S. 147
127 S. Ct. 793
166 L. Ed. 2d 628
2007 U.S. LEXIS 1005
20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 33
26 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 675
75 U.S.L.W. 4042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain an unauthorized second or successive petition
holding that petitioner’s failure to obtain authorization to file a successive petition deprived the district court of jurisdiction to consider the successive petition
holding that district court lacked jurisdiction to consider successive petition where petitioner failed to obtain authorization to file
holding that a petition is “second or successive” where the 13 petitioner challenges “the same custody imposed by the same judgment of a state court” as 14 in a prior petition
concluding that the District Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a state prisoner’s second or successive habeas petition challenging custody because the petitioner failed to comply with the gatekeeping requirements of § 2244(b
holding that failure of petitioner to obtain authorization to file a “second or successive” petition deprived the district court of jurisdiction to consider the second or successive petition “in the first place”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

159 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Burton v. Stewart

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.