Montclair v. Ramsdell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that a statute or regulation should be construed to give effect to all its provisions so that no part of it will be inoperative, superfluous, void, or insignificant
• upholding DEA’s interpretation of the “undefined and potentially ambiguous statutory term” “derivative” in the Controlled Substances Act
• “It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a stat-ute____”
• “It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a stat-ute_”
• court's duty, if possible, is to give effect to every clause and word of a statute
• “It is the duty of the court to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statute[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).