Nevada Supreme Court· 6/6/1991
Doleman v. State
Citations
- 812 P.2d 1287
- 107 Nev. 409
- 1991 Nev. LEXIS 108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where police entered into a hotel room to prevent possible danger as a result of defendant still being in possession of a gun, such warrantless entry was constitutional
- evidence of defendant’s culpability in robbery and murder of cab driver was sufficient to satisfy requirements for imposition of death penalty
- evidence of defendant's culpability in robbery and murder of cab driver was sufficient to satisfy requirements for imposition of death penalty
- collective knowledge approach found proper regarding all facts possessed by the police involved in this investigation
- jury instructed on various theories of first-degree murder including premeditation and felony-murder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Springer, Mowbray, Steffen, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rose v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2007-07-26· cited 154×
- Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-10-22· cited 71×
- Doleman v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-07-22· cited 66×
- Witter v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-07-22· cited 60×
- Guy v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1992-09-03· cited 60×
- Walker v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 50×
- Libby v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1993-09-09· cited 41×
- King v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-03-13· cited 26×
- BELCHER, JR. (NORMAN) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-06-04· cited 26×
- Camacho v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2003-08-29· cited 24×
- State v. HarnischNevada Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 22×
- Batson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-06-17· cited 20×
- State v. McKellipsNevada Supreme Court· 2002-07-18· cited 20×
- Howe v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-04-30· cited 17×
- Paine v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1991-12-30· cited 14×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-04· cited 11×
- Nika v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-12-30· cited 11×
- Taylor (Donald) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-09-18· cited 11×
- Serenity Lane, Inc. v. Lane County AssessorOregon Tax Court· 2013-08-30· cited 11×
- Moore v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-03-10· cited 5×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyNinth Circuit· 1984-02-10· cited 1,819×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,617×
- Cabana v. BullockSupreme Court· 1986-01-22· cited 536×
- Koza v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1984-04-25· cited 99×
- United States v. Geoffrey William BrileyEighth Circuit· 1984-02-02· cited 97×
- United States v. Manuel Nicholas DiazSeventh Circuit· 1987-04-28· cited 75×
- United States v. Paul Manfredi, George Weggers, and Emory ButnerNinth Circuit· 1984-01-26· cited 73×
- Foreman v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 73×
- Rose v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-02-28· cited 60×
- United States v. Larry GoodNinth Circuit· 1986-01-10· cited 48×
- United States v. Charles E. RoseEighth Circuit· 1976-09-09· cited 42×
- Banks v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1978-03-02· cited 33×
- State v. HardinNevada Supreme Court· 1974-01-17· cited 23×
- McCabe v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1982-12-30· cited 19×
- Johnson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1981-12-30· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.