Skip to main content

Camacho v. State

Citations

  • 75 P.3d 370
  • 119 Nev. 395
  • 119 Nev. Adv. Rep. 47
  • 2003 Nev. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that legal questions are reviewed de novo and factual questions are reviewed for sufficiency of the evidence
  • explaining that the inevitable-discovery doctrine permits the introduction of evidence originally obtained by unconstitutional conduct if the prosecution establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that it would have been lawfully discovered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Maupin, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.