United States v. Geoffrey William Briley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “officers’ cryptic statement that they had important matters to discuss with the [defendant]” was not misrepresentation
• concluding that the officers’ statement that they wanted to discuss important matters with the defendant was not a misrepresentation of the officers’ purpose of arresting the defendant
• concluding that the officers’ statement that they wanted to discuss important matters with the defendant was not a misrepresentation of the officers’ purpose of arresting the defendant
• stating that “[a]n anonymous tip from an informer may serve as a basis for probable cause as long as its reliability is established through corroboration”
• stating that a \misrepre- sentation may even invalidate . . . consent if the consent was given in reliance on the officer's deceit\
• stating that “[a]n anonymous tip from an informer may serve as a basis for probable cause as long as its reliability is established through corroboration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).