Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 998 P.2d 1172
  • 1 Nev. 349
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 38
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that even aggravated prosecutorial misconduct may constitute harmless error where 19 there is overwhelming evidence of guilt
  • providing that prosecutorial misconduct may SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 9 (0) 1947A be harmless where there is overwhelming evidence of guilt
  • providing that SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A adfilyo 21 prosecutorial misconduct may be harmless where there is overwhelming evidence of guilt
  • providing that prosecutorial misconduct may be harmless where there is overwhelming evidence of guilt
  • providing that prosecutorial misconduct may be harmless where there is overwhelming evidence of guilt
  • finding that the district court did not err by failing to give the addict-informer instruction where the State did not concede the addict-informer was unreliable and the jury was otherwise properly instructed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Shearing, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.