· 4/25/1984
Koza v. State
Citations
- 681 P.2d 44
- 100 Nev. 245
- 1984 Nev. LEXIS 362
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- consecutive enhanced penalties proper where separate and distinct statutes and offenses are involved
- stating review standard for sufficiency of evidence
- stating review standard for sufficiency of evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.