Skip to main content
· 4/25/1984

Koza v. State

Citations

  • 681 P.2d 44
  • 100 Nev. 245
  • 1984 Nev. LEXIS 362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • consecutive enhanced penalties proper where separate and distinct statutes and offenses are involved
  • stating review standard for sufficiency of evidence
  • stating review standard for sufficiency of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.