United States v. Paul Manfredi, George Weggers, and Emory Butner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that as part of showing that a warrantless entry was “imperative,” the government must demonstrate “that a warrant could not have been obtained in time even by tele- phone under the procedure authorized by Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(c)(2).”
• government inexplicably failed to introduce evidence regarding time required to obtain a telephone warrant
• one and one-half hour delay did not require a telephonic warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).