Skip to main content

Howe v. State

Citations

  • 916 P.2d 153
  • 112 Nev. 458
  • 1996 Nev. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that exigent circumstances did not support warrantless entry based upon the smell of burning marijuana
  • holding that exigent circumstances did not support warrantless entry based upon the smell of burning marijuana
  • warrantless entry to prevent destruction of marijuana unreasonable, in part because officers believed marijuana was not inside, but outside of the house
  • smell of burning marijuana did not give rise to an exigency
  • analyzing warrant exception for home search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Shearing, Springer, Steffen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.