Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “disturbing procedural irregularities, including deviations from normal company procedure, provide support for a plaintiff’s assertion of pretext” (quotation omitted)
• explaining that “deviations from normal company procedure” supported plaintiff’s assertion of pretext for retaliation claim (quotation cleaned up)
• finding that the district court abused its discretion in relying upon evidentiary materials presented for the first time in a reply brief
• holding district court abused its discretion when “it relied on new evidentiary materials presented for the first time” in a reply brief
• holding district court abused its discretion when “it relied on new evidentiary materials presented for the first time” in a reply brief
• holding that issues not raised on appeal are deemed waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).