Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 4/26/1994

Doe v. William Shapiro, Esquire, P.C.

Citations

  • 852 F. Supp. 1246
  • 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 345
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5563
  • 1994 WL 189827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the Title VII interpretation of ‘employer’ should be applied to the [ADA]”
  • legal arm of corporation that received at least 90% of cases from the corporation and shared office suite, resources, fax and phone numbers, and printing services with corporation is sufficiently interrelated
  • “[C]ourts reason that individual defendants are covered by the statute because they exercise authority conferred upon them by the employer; thus suits . . . should be against them in their official capacities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gawthrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Doe v. William Shapiro, Esquire, P.C.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.