Kinnally v. Bell of Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 15(c) can be satisfied “where a party who has some reason to expect his potential involvement as a defendant hears of the commencement of litigation through some informal means”
• finding that defendant “received every indication that [his] conduct was being formally reviewed” from factual statement
• failure to name individual defendants, in addition to the company, in a sex discrimination case constituted “mistake concerning identity”
• Constructive notice can be established by the fact that the same attorney represents both the original defendants and those added in the amended complaint.
• claims against party included in ADA questionnaire regarded as exhausted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).