Philadelphia Contributionship Insurance v. Shapiro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellee was prejudiced where the information appellant refused to disclose was the information underlying the claims at issue
• concluding that appellee was prejudiced where the information appellant refused to disclose was the information underlying the claims at issue
• stating that violating two court orders to comply with discovery obligations established appellants acted “willfully” and “dilatory” during a sixteen-month period
• stating that violating two court orders to comply with discovery obligations established appellants acted “willfully” and “dilatory” during a sixteen-month period
• finding that Judge McClure “accurately interpreted] Pennsylvania law” in finding that emotional distress cannot constitute “bodily injury”
• deciding dismissal was commensurate sanction for failure -9- J-S36024-20 to comply with discovery requests and orders for 16 months; litigant’s failure to supply discovery at issue prejudiced opponent’s ability to establish defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).