Skip to main content

Doe v. Kohn Nast & Graf, P.C.

Citations

  • 862 F. Supp. 1310
  • 1994 WL 454813

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because discharged employee had no contractual right to payment for accrued but unused vacation days, summary judgment in favor of employer was proper for WPCL claim
  • holding that vacation time was not owed to Plaintiff because the vacation clause was nonspecific on how much vacation time employees were entitled to
  • denying summary judgment because “[defendants’ quarrel over punitives ... is that their behavior was not sufficiently egregious to warrant their imposition. That is an issue of fact for the jury”
  • allowing a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing to survive summary judgment when different facts supported the breach of contract and discrimination claims
  • applying Price Waterhouse in retaliatory discharge case under ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gawthrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Doe v. Kohn Nast & Graf, P.C.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.