Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/3/2003

Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.

Citations

  • 345 F.3d 290
  • 2003 WL 22048025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that federal regulation against discriminatory pricing of life insurance policies did not directly conflict with or impair any state insurance law or policy
  • “We . . . decline to differentiate claims of disparate impact and claims of intentional discrimination at this preliminary stage of litigation”
  • “Every circuit that has considered the question has determined that federal anti-discrimination laws may be applied in an insurance context, even where the state insurance agencies have mechanisms in place to regulate discriminatory practices.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benavides, Davis, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.