Fifth Circuit· 6/25/1993
Malina v. Gonzales
Citations
- 994 F.2d 1121
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15468
- 1993 WL 226426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that actions are judicial for immunity purposes if they are “closely related to a general judicial function”
- explaining that the relevant inquiry regarding the first factor is to “examine the ‘nature and function’ of the act, not the act itself” and that a court should “look to the particular act’s relation to a general function normally performed by a judge” (citation omitted)
- “In some situations, immunity is to be afforded even though one or more of the McAlester factors is not met.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Garza, Rainey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnida W. Barnes v. Byron R. WinchellSixth Circuit· 1997-02-03· cited 378×
- Bradt v. WestTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-12-22· cited 213×
- Davis v. Tarrant County, Tex.Fifth Circuit· 2009-04-08· cited 179×
- Ballard v. WallFifth Circuit· 2005-06-17· cited 161×
- Laughlin v. Olszewski,et alFifth Circuit· 1996-12-30· cited 50×
- Houston Community Hospital v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Texas, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2007-03-09· cited 41×
- St. Clair v. Johnny's Oyster & Shrimp, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1999-12-17· cited 35×
- Florance v. BuchmeyerN.D. Texas· 2007-07-31· cited 30×
- Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2003-09-03· cited 28×
- Davenport v. RodriguezS.D. Texas· 2001-05-09· cited 27×
- Thomas v. StateN.D. Texas· 2018-02-13· cited 27×
- Woodruff v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 2004-11-17· cited 26×
- James v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2014-05-08· cited 22×
- United States v. WrightFifth Circuit· 2023-01-18· cited 17×
- Amato v. Office of Com'r of SecuritiesLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-11-15· cited 16×
- Doe v. LinamS.D. Texas· 2002-08-21· cited 16×
- Schaff v. Sun Line Cruises, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1998-03-24· cited 14×
- Shabazz v. Texas Youth CommissionN.D. Texas· 2003-09-30· cited 12×
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterS.D. Texas· 1999-08-17· cited 11×
- Campaign for Southern Equality v. Mississippi Department of Human ServicesS.D. Mississippi· 2016-03-31· cited 11×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court· 1978-06-05· cited 5,547×
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court· 1991-10-21· cited 4,474×
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court· 1967-04-11· cited 4,282×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,476×
- Tanglewood East Homeowners Jimmie D. Lee, Jr. v. Charles-Thomas, Inc., First Federal Savings & Loan Association of ConroeFirst Circuit· 1988-07-28· cited 155×
- Doris Adams v. Grainger W. McIlhany Individually and as Presiding Judge of the 31st Judicial District of TexasFifth Circuit· 1985-06-27· cited 121×
- Joseph Brewer v. M. Prentiss BlackwellFifth Circuit· 1982-11-29· cited 110×
- Flor Lopez v. William Vanderwater and Howard Wheeler GambleSeventh Circuit· 1980-04-29· cited 101×
- James Oliver McAlester Et Ux. v. David H. BrownFifth Circuit· 1972-12-05· cited 98×
- Jack R. Harper v. Arden Mays MerckleFifth Circuit· 1981-03-05· cited 85×
- Dr. Alvin I. Thomas, Cross-Appellant v. Eristus Sams, Individually and as Mayor of Prairie View, and City of Prairie View, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1984-09-17· cited 75×
- Wallace Watts v. Odom Graves, SheriffFifth Circuit· 1983-12-12· cited 73×
- Ken Mouille, Laurie Rollins v. City of Live OakFifth Circuit· 1991-01-08· cited 39×
- Chromalloy Mining and Minerals Alaska Division, Chromalloy American Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardFifth Circuit· 1980-07-10· cited 33×
- Schnabel Foundation Co. v. Harbor InsuranceSupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 32×
- W. Douglas Williams v. Honorable Jack BrooksFifth Circuit· 1991-10-31· cited 20×
- Junius Hart Piano House, Ltd. v. IngmanSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1907-10-21· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.