Fifth Circuit· 8/27/2001

Doleac v. Michalson

Citations

264 F.3d 470
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19186
2001 WL 984674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the citizenship of parties subsequently named to identify fictitious defendants must be considered when determining if complete diversity is present
holding that §1447(e) applies whether a non-diverse defendant is being added or whether a “John Doe” is being identified as a non-diverse defendant
holding that subsequent identification of a John Doe defendant as non-diverse named defendant requires remand
holding that there is no due process right to appellate review in U.S. Constitution
holding that there is no due-process right to appellate review
holding that there is no due-process right to appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Hall, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.