· 8/27/2001
Doleac v. Michalson
Citations
- 264 F.3d 470
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19186
- 2001 WL 984674
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the citizenship of parties subsequently named to identify fictitious defendants must be considered when determining if complete diversity is present
- holding that §1447(e) applies whether a non-diverse defendant is being added or whether a “John Doe” is being identified as a non-diverse defendant
- holding that subsequent identification of a John Doe defendant as non-diverse named defendant requires remand
- holding that there is no due process right to appellate review in U.S. Constitution
- holding that there is no due-process right to appellate review
- holding that there is no due-process right to appellate review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garwood, Hall, Barksdale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.