· 7/25/2002
Martinez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Citations
- 300 F.3d 567
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14915
- 2002 WL 1721803
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the court will entertain new issues raised for the first time on appeal only in extraordinary circumstances
- “Even when a State consents to suit in its own courts ... it may retain Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in federal court.”
- “Because the district court did not identify which factual issues it consid- ered genuine, one option is to analyze the record to determine those issues of fact the court likely considered genuine.”
- “[T]he Act waives state sovereign immunity only in Texas state courts.”
- “A denial of . . . qualified immunity is immediately appealable under the collateral[-] order doctrine . . . .” (quoting Rodriguez v. Neeley, 169 F.3d 220, 222 (5th Cir. 1999)); Walton v. City of Verona, 82 F.4th 314, 320 (5th Cir. 2023
- report- ing a prison beating
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barksdale, Stewart, Duplantier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.