Skip to main content
· 7/25/2002

Martinez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Citations

  • 300 F.3d 567
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14915
  • 2002 WL 1721803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the court will entertain new issues raised for the first time on appeal only in extraordinary circumstances
  • “Even when a State consents to suit in its own courts ... it may retain Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in federal court.”
  • “Because the district court did not identify which factual issues it consid- ered genuine, one option is to analyze the record to determine those issues of fact the court likely considered genuine.”
  • “[T]he Act waives state sovereign immunity only in Texas state courts.”
  • “A denial of . . . qualified immunity is immediately appealable under the collateral[-] order doctrine . . . .” (quoting Rodriguez v. Neeley, 169 F.3d 220, 222 (5th Cir. 1999)); Walton v. City of Verona, 82 F.4th 314, 320 (5th Cir. 2023
  • report- ing a prison beating

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barksdale, Stewart, Duplantier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.