Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that in light of section 311.023(3), \a court never acts illegally when it considers legislative history\
• noting that courts should apply “text- centric model” when construing statutes, using extrinsic aids such as legislative history only when text is not clear
• noting that courts should apply \text-centric model\ when construing statutes, using extrinsic aids such as legislative history only when text is not clear
• noting that courts should apply \text-centric model\ when construing statutes, using extrinsic aids such as legislative history only when text is not clear
• noting that courts should apply “text- centric model” when construing statutes, using extrinsic aids such as legislative history only when text is not clear
• using Commissioner of Insurance report implemented pursuant to statute as evidence of Legislature’s knowledge of report’s contents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-05-12· cited 13×
• Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-04-09· cited 10×
• Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-04-09· cited 4×
• Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-26· cited 2×
• Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-04-30
• Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-05-12
• Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-26
• Ojo v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-26