Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Henry Cisneros

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “HUD has never applied a disparate impact analysis to insurers”
• “Accordingly, we conclude that HUD’s interpretation of the Fair Housing Act is consistent with goals of the Fair Housing Act and a reasonable interpretation of the statute.”
• “[w]e agree with the conclusion in American Family [Mutual Ins. Co.] that §§ 3604 and 3605 overlap and are not mutually exclusive”
• “[T]he maxim ‘expressio unius est exclusion alterius,’ ... states that the mention of one thing implies exclusion of another.”
• “[Because the [FHA] does not mention insurance, it is covered by the McCarran-Ferguson Act and cannot be construed ... to invalidate, impair or supersede any state law enacted to regulate the business of insurance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).