Fifth Circuit· 4/10/2000
Arguello v. Conoco, Inc.
Citations
- 207 F.3d 803
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6435
- 2000 WL 305928
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the right to impose standards of operation and to de-brand local stores was insufficient to establish agency relationship because the purported principal was not in control of the store’s daily operations
- reasoning that the “plain language” of contracts between an energy company and its individual gas stations specified that each station was an “independent business” and therefore foreclosed an agency relationship
- discussing general agency principles in the context of a section 1981 claim and reversing summary judgment on scope of employment
- finding lack of day-to-day control by franchisor of franchisee’s opera- tions and hiring decisions precluded agency finding for al- leged customer-service-based harms
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Davis, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Causey v. Sewell Cadillac-Chevrolet, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2004-12-14· cited 479×
- Arguello v. Conoco, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2003-05-05· cited 110×
- DeCorte v. JordanFifth Circuit· 2007-08-15· cited 86×
- United States Ex Rel. Bias v. Tangipahoa Parish School BoardFifth Circuit· 2016-03-09· cited 81×
- Kaye v. Lone Star Fund V (U.S.), L.P.N.D. Texas· 2011-04-26· cited 78×
- Carnell Construction Corp. v. Danville Redevelopment & Housing AuthorityFourth Circuit· 2014-03-06· cited 64×
- Callwood v. Dave & Buster's, Inc.D. Maryland· 2000-06-07· cited 49×
- Rodney Green Charlan Green v. Dillard's, Inc., National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Kansas City Branch, Amicus on Behalf OfEighth Circuit· 2007-04-05· cited 42×
- Floeting v. Grp. Health Coop.Washington Supreme Court· 2019-01-31· cited 32×
- Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2003-09-03· cited 28×
- Feacher v. Intercontinental Hotels GroupN.D. New York· 2008-06-03· cited 26×
- Gallentine v. Housing AuthorityE.D. Texas· 2013-01-22· cited 26×
- Benton v. Cousins Properties, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2002-09-27· cited 24×
- McCoy v. Homestead Studio Suites HotelsS.D. Texas· 2005-05-11· cited 18×
- Hardie v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nNinth Circuit· 2017-06-27· cited 16×
- Solomon v. Waffle House, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2004-11-04· cited 15×
- Akiyama v. United States Judo Inc.W.D. Washington· 2002-01-10· cited 14×
- Jefferson v. City of FremontN.D. California· 2014-11-06· cited 11×
- Slocumb v. Waffle House, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2005-03-15· cited 10×
- Monson v. Rochester Athlectic ClubCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-01-06· cited 8×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court· 1971-03-08· cited 3,596×
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 2,518×
- General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 1,067×
- Odie Joe Reid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyFifth Circuit· 1986-02-04· cited 396×
- Neff v. American Dairy Queen Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1995-07-20· cited 97×
- Mildred Prunty v. Arkansas Freightways, Inc., and Chuck BaughFifth Circuit· 1994-04-18· cited 95×
- Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1994-11-30· cited 68×
- Gordon D. Simms, Gordon D. Simms v. First Gibraltar Bank, First Gibraltar Bank, Fsb, Now Known as First Madison Bank, FsbFirst Circuit· 1996-05-31· cited 64×
- Saul Olzman v. Lake Hills Swim Club, Inc.Second Circuit· 1974-04-19· cited 62×
- Karen FLANAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AARON E. HENRY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES CENTER, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsFifth Circuit· 1989-07-13· cited 39×
- Domar Ocean Transportation, Ltd., a Division of Lee-Vac, Ltd. v. Independent Refining Company v. Milford Navigation Company, Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1986-02-14· cited 37×
- City of Chicago v. Matchmaker Real Estate Sales Center, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1992-12-10· cited 37×
- Perry v. Burger King Corp.S.D. New York· 1996-05-02· cited 35×
- Winters v. Highlands Insurance CompanyFifth Circuit· 1978-03-09· cited 18×
- Robinson v. Power Pizza, Inc.M.D. Florida· 1998-02-11· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.