Skip to main content
· 4/26/1996

Dee Farmer v. Edward Brennan

Citations

  • 81 F.3d 1444
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 71
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 9869
  • 1996 WL 202515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court abused discretion by denying Rule 56(d) motion that sought opportunity to conduct discovery under new legal standard after remand from Supreme Court
  • \This Court has noted that the party seeking further time to respond to a summary judgment motion must give an adequate explanation to the court of the reasons why the extension is necessary.\
  • “[W]e review a district court’s grant of summary judgment under Rule 56 de novo, to the extent the question is whether there were genuine disputes of material facts or whether the moving party should prevail as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.