Resolution Trust Corporation v. North Bridge Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a voluntary arbitration agreement in which 23 the plaintiff had an opportunity to opt out of the arbitration provision “lacks the necessary 24 element of procedural unconscionability”
• noting, for example, “[i]f the government investigated the facts 23 alleged in [first-filed] complaint on a nationwide basis, it would discover continuing fraud in the 24 New Jersey offices [which was the focus of the later-filed complaint”
• stating 25 that “[s]ection 3730(b) is designed to allow recovery when a qui tam relator puts the government 26 on notice of potential fraud being worked against the government, but to bar copycat actions that 27 provide no additional material information”
• district court abused discretion in denying Rule 56(f) motion when most of delay attributable to opposing party
• reversing denial of Rule 56(f) motion
• discussing federal counterpart Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).