John C. Babcock v. R.L. White and G. McDaniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “failure to prevent exposure to risk of harm . . . does not entitle [a plaintiff] to monetary compensation”
• holding that plaintiff’s “allegations of deliberate indifference do not exemplify the egregious conduct” causing psychological harm “sufficient to entitle him to damages under the Eighth Amendment”
• holding that plaintiff’s “allegations of deliberate indifference do not exemplify the egregious conduct” causing psychological harm “sufficient to entitle him to damages under the Eighth Amendment”
• holding that because plaintiff was not assaulted and the issue of present danger was not before the court, plaintiff did not have an Eighth Amendment claim
• holding that the plaintiff's \allegations of deliberate indifference do not exemplify the egregious conduct\ causing psychological harm \sufficient to entitle him to damages under the Eighth Amendment\
• holding that the plaintiff's \allegations of deliberate indifference do not exemplify the egregious conduct\ causing psychological harm \sufficient to entitle him to damages under the Eighth Amendment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).