Csc Holdings, Inc. v. Frank P. Redisi, Sr., and Frank P. Redisi, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a district court may deny a motion to compel deposition testimony “that would not aid in ‘the exploration of a material issue.’ ”
• noting that because plaintiff sought an “accounting and profits remedy” as 11 an alternative form of relief under the Cable Communications Policy Act, an “asset 12 freeze [was] thus proper” under Grupo Mexicano
• describing the continuing violation doc- trine as applied to Title VII actions and the require- ments of the equitable tolling doctrine
• stating asset freeze permissible where plaintiff sought an equitable remedy in the alternative that imposed a constructive trust on defendant
• affirming district court’s order freezing assets when plaintiff moved for both legal and equitable relief and the assets were related to the equitable relief sought
• equitable tolling operates until the plaintiff knew or by reasonable diligence should have known of both the injury and its governing cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).